top of page
Search

AI Governance and Global Power: The New Race to Rule the Digital Future

ree

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just a technological breakthrough; it has become a matter of national power. Countries are not only competing to build smarter systems but to decide how these systems should be governed. In my opinion, the race to lead in AI governance will determine who controls the rules of global innovation, digital markets, and even national security.


The European Union: Rule by Regulation

The European Union has positioned itself as the global regulator of AI. Its landmark Artificial Intelligence Act categorizes AI systems into four risk levels—minimal, limited, high, and unacceptable. Systems considered too dangerous, such as social scoring and predictive policing, are banned outright.

  • Goal: Protect citizens and create trust in AI systems.

  • Impact: Non-EU companies must comply if they want access to the EU market, effectively exporting European values worldwide. However, this approach faces criticism for potentially slowing innovation, especially as the EU tries to balance ethics with competitiveness.


The United States: Innovation First, Rules Later

The United States takes a more flexible path. It has no single national AI law but relies on sector-specific rules and voluntary frameworks. The current administration promotes a market-driven strategy focused on:

  1. Accelerating AI research through partnerships between the government and the private sector.

  2. Reducing regulatory barriers to encourage innovation and maintain leadership over China.

  3. Strengthening national security by controlling AI exports and safeguarding critical infrastructure. This “innovation first” model has helped the U.S. lead in AI technology, but risks public distrust without clear accountability mechanisms.


China: The State-Led Model

China’s approach is deeply integrated with national policy. The government regulates AI through strict rules for algorithmic recommendations, content generation, and data use. The aim is to maintain social stability and state control.

  • Strategy: Combine regulation with massive public investment in AI infrastructure.

  • Influence: China promotes its AI governance model abroad, pushing for a new international organization to set global standards. This strategy gives China significant influence, particularly among developing countries seeking AI growth without Western dependency.


Africa’s Opportunity: From Rule-Taker to Rule-Maker

Africa, especially Nigeria, has the chance to shape its own AI governance framework. Instead of copying Western or Chinese models, regional leaders can focus on:

  • Data sovereignty: Protecting citizens’ digital rights while promoting innovation.

  • Local context: Addressing social and economic priorities, such as agriculture and education.

Partnerships: Engaging with global alliances to influence international AI norms. If African nations build strong, ethical AI policies now, they can participate as equal players in global digital governance.


The Future Belongs to Those Who Set the Rules

AI governance has become a powerful tool for shaping the future. The EU’s ethical framework, the U.S. innovation model, and China’s state-driven system each reflect different visions of power. The nations and organizations that define the rules of AI today will control the flow of technology, trade, and influence tomorrow.

At OGUN Security Research and Strategic Consulting LLC (OSRS), we help governments, businesses, and institutions design ethical, compliant, and risk-aware AI governance strategies. OSRS supports clients in aligning with global frameworks while promoting responsible innovation.


About the Author:

Dr. Sunday O. Ogunlana is the Founder of OGUN Security Research and Strategic Consulting LLC. He is a cybersecurity professor and AI governance expert specializing in digital policy, national security, and emerging technology strategy.

Comments

bottom of page